Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2016 10:18:46 GMT -6
Their tax filings. Available online
|
|
|
Post by Raymond306 on Sept 17, 2016 10:26:30 GMT -6
Their tax filings. Available online I see, we're going to stretch this out by dribs and drabs. Fine. Here's the link to my source of information. Let's have YOUR link.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2016 10:47:35 GMT -6
You're a grown man I don't need to find links for you just type in Google Susan G Komen 2015 16 tax filings
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2016 10:48:36 GMT -6
You'll know you have it when you were looking at a PDF of their tax return. Is senility setting in? ๐๐๐
|
|
|
Post by Raymond306 on Sept 17, 2016 11:04:05 GMT -6
I don't need to find links for you Oh, I see. You just made this shit up from some nonsense you found on Facebook or some such. Since you can't seem to provide the page I guess we can move on to something else.
|
|
|
Post by chrunch on Sept 17, 2016 11:55:44 GMT -6
Like Susan g komen who takes in 405 million and puts out 295 million? Ohhh spooky it must be a conspiracy. Or board members lining their pockets. I wonder which one? ? ๐ฎ๐ฎ Well mik, you are comparing apples to durian. You compare charitable giving (72.8%) / revenue, I was comparing charitable giving (5.7%) / expenditures. That's ok though. I will use the Clinton Foundation's revenue of $177.8 million.So, let's see. Komen - $ 295 million / $405 million - 72.8%
Clinton - $5.7 million / $177.8 million - 3.2%
Why are you comparing a foundation that gave 72.8% of their income to charity, to the Clinton's who only spent 3.2%? Are you trying to make my point? You know what? Comparing the Komen and Clinton foundations is still like comparing apples to durian.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2016 14:55:20 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by chrunch on Sept 17, 2016 15:48:14 GMT -6
Wow, now I must vote for Hiliary.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2016 15:50:16 GMT -6
Must admit ape overlord president sounds pretty exciting!
|
|
|
Post by chrunch on Sept 17, 2016 22:44:54 GMT -6
Speaking of apes, why do you keep throwing so much crap?
You attack Komen by comparing them to Clinton and then when I show you that Komen gives nearly 23 times as much of their income as Clinton, *PLOP*, Trump is like an ape.
It seems you cared at how little the Komen Foundation paid out. You don't care that the Clinton Foundation gives only a fraction that?
|
|
|
Post by chrunch on Sept 17, 2016 22:46:23 GMT -6
Must admit ape overlord president sounds pretty exciting! LIKE
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2016 5:30:29 GMT -6
So Ray, thoughts on Trumps idea of "rolling back" freedom of the press rights? Mr. Kahn may have been right, he doesn't know the constitution.
|
|
|
Post by Raymond306 on Sept 20, 2016 13:20:08 GMT -6
So Ray, thoughts on Trumps idea of "rolling back" freedom of the press rights? When I first read your question I was like: . o O (What the hell is he on about, now?) So I perused the world wide web and, you're right, the media, in general, have had apoplectic seizures of the "Trump Declares War on 1st Amendment" variety. Oddly, I can't remember these same media going into a frenzy over the demonstrable efforts by Democrats to destroy the 1st, 2nd, 5th, 10th 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments (to name a few) but this is NOT a defense of Donald Trump, merely an observation. Then I realized this has been an ongoing theme, and that what you are specifically referring to are remarks Trump made this morning following the weekend's New York City terrorist pipe bombings. Here are the operative statements made by Donald Trump earlier today: I certainly understand where Trump is coming from. He's running for election against people who can't even bring themselves to say "Islamic terrorism" much less do anything substantive to combat it. We are at war with people who will go to any extent to destroy us while President Obama and his minions apparently haven't yet decided whose side they're on in this existential battle. Mr. Kahn may have been right, he doesn't know the constitution. I would go so far as to say 95% of those in government at this moment haven't a clue about what is contained in the Constitution, and most of the 5% who do know something about it are hell bent to destroy it because they are against what is found in the Constitution.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2016 15:21:09 GMT -6
I see you conveniently always leave out tidbits that add so much to the gravitas of the situation. Well done sir ๐
|
|
|
Post by Raymond306 on Sept 20, 2016 16:12:39 GMT -6
. o O (Good god! What's he on about now?)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2016 16:30:25 GMT -6
You never acknowledged my assertion that he wants to eliminate freedom of the press. Very loosely extrapolated this website could be considered press, you would be jailed. Come on Ray I want your honest opinion
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2016 16:33:23 GMT -6
Wow even W the first came out for Hillary today. That says something. I'll bet W the second is ignoring everything and just painting
|
|
|
Post by Raymond306 on Sept 20, 2016 16:50:35 GMT -6
You never acknowledged my assertion that he wants to eliminate freedom of the press. But, Mikey, just because you or some other left-wing kook decide to "assert" something on the Internet, that doesn't make it the Word of God. You are free to assert whatever you want. Wow even W the first came out for Hillary today. That says something. It certainly explains the rise of the "constitutional conservative" movement. We will come to rue the day we allowed advocates of big government progressivism to control the Republican Party.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2016 17:43:52 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Raymond306 on Sept 20, 2016 18:33:12 GMT -6
And yet, the "Birther Issue" was created by, and advanced by Hillary Clinton campaign supporters during the Democrat primaries in 2008. Go figure.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2016 18:36:24 GMT -6
That's a lie.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2016 18:38:17 GMT -6
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2016 18:39:44 GMT -6
Lies by omission are still lies.
|
|
|
Post by Raymond306 on Sept 20, 2016 18:59:47 GMT -6
I got a $20 bill in my wallet that says it's not. You want fade that bet? Before I go to the effort to earn it? Now Ray will tell me factcheck.org is a liberal think tank They are not a "think tank."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2016 19:01:57 GMT -6
So I'm right, you don't trust factcheck?
|
|
|
Post by chrunch on Sept 20, 2016 22:08:45 GMT -6
Sidney, grassy knoll, Blumenthal, a long time friend of the Clinton's was pushing the story during the 2008 campaign. He did not work for the campaign though.
|
|
|
Post by Raymond306 on Sept 21, 2016 11:35:37 GMT -6
Sidney Blumenthal has had his nose up the Clintons' asses (and particularly Hillary's) since 1997 when he served as an aide for President Bill Clinton. Whether or not he was officially "on the payroll" is irrelevant to his working FOR the campaign. A great part of the Hillary Clinton Email Scandal involves her communications with Blumenthal while she was Secretary of State despite being forbidden to work for Hillary by Obama Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 21, 2016 13:38:30 GMT -6
Ah yes the loose connection that proves your wild conspiracy theory, if it helps you sleep at night ๐
|
|
|
Post by chrunch on Sept 21, 2016 17:42:31 GMT -6
Ah yes the loose connection that proves your wild conspiracy theory, if it helps you sleep at night ๐ Your are the one that threw this latest turd into the conversation. I find Seth Meyers concluding that Trump is a racist, laughable. That seems to be the left's answer to anything when I comes to Obama. I once was having a conversation about the ACA with a professor from Texas A&M. I told him it would be a job killer because of the employer mandate. I explained that small companies, the size of the one I worked for, would be unable to grow beyond 50 full time employees, and that changing the definition of a full time employee from 37 hours a week to 30, would force us to cut hours for many of our part time employees. Unable to come up with a counter argument, he said, "oh, so your're a racist then". What in the hell does opposing the ACA have to do with race? What the hell does questioning what country the president is from, have to do with race? Oh, I know the answer to both of those questions. Not a damn thing. So back to your turd. Who had anything to gain by pushing the narrative that Obama was not a natural born citizen? Did the star of a highly rated reality show have anything to gain from that? No. The only person on the planet who had anything to gain was Hillary Clinton. Jim Asher, the investigative editor in the Washington bureau of the McClatchy newspapers at the time, has said that Sidney Blumenthal told him in person that Obama was born in Kenya. He has no reason to lie. Blumenthal has every reason to.
|
|
|
Post by chrunch on Sept 22, 2016 10:38:53 GMT -6
|
|