|
Post by Raymond306 on Oct 7, 2016 16:17:54 GMT -6
Last night I was listening to the Mark Levin Show and he gave a perfectly logical reason why our country seems to be in such desperate straits. Fortunately Conservative Review has provided an audio clip of Levin's explanation:
|
|
Hagar
Contributor
Posts: 34
|
Post by Hagar on Nov 13, 2016 14:19:39 GMT -6
stupid enough to elect a loud mouth snook lol
|
|
|
Post by Raymond306 on Nov 13, 2016 15:16:46 GMT -6
stupid enough to elect a loud mouth snook lol Didn't have much choice, did we? It was either Trump or a corrupt, incompetent, screeching, communist, America-hating, unindicted felon whose supporters represent the worst dregs of anti-American society. Pretty clear choice to me.
|
|
|
Post by Raymond306 on Nov 21, 2016 10:35:40 GMT -6
I think I finally understand Ray and the beliefs he was taught. This shall be the end of my arguing politics. You can't change 70 years of core belief with logic and facts. It forces the inner human to face all that they are. And I do not wish to make anyone look at that journey, that's up to them selves. To quote that great sage Yakov Smirnoff: "What a country!" Even in the face of unimaginable horror innovative entrepreneurs can find ways to succor a suffering multitude: There we go. No more problem. Whoops! Maybe not!
|
|
|
Post by chrunch on Nov 21, 2016 18:26:13 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Raymond306 on Jan 5, 2017 12:38:39 GMT -6
So, moving right along with our review of the stupid people who surround us, we must include the current administration Justice Department and their secretary pool. the MSM. It seems this past Tuesday a young mentally disabled man was attacked by 4 young black men and the entire episode was streamed live on FaceBook video!
While they describe the incident as "sickening" Chicago police are being very careful not to jump to any unwarranted conclusions:
So far the Chicago police are pretty ruling out an political significance in the attack:
And in their efforts to keep open minds the cops are carefully avoiding the designation, "Hate Crime" GASP!
Now, here's the whole point of this exercise. Anybody with even half a brain (and by this I mean liberal progressives are excused from having to participate in the exercise although they may monitor the course) knows that if the roles were reversed, and if it was 4 white guys who had kidnapped a mentally impaired black guy, tortured him for 24 to 48 hours and someone on a video of the event was heard to shout "F*** black people!" "F**** Obama!" don't you know the Obama Justice Department would be screaming "HATE CRIME HATE CRIME HATE CRIME" even before the cops had finished stringing yellow crime scene tape.
16 days, Just 16 more days until the nightmare ends.
|
|
|
Post by Raymond306 on Jan 30, 2017 18:25:15 GMT -6
And yet another display of the monumental, bone crushing, jaw dropping ignorance that fuels the political left. Now it's President Trump non-ban of Muslims. Oh my god! It's illegal, it's un-constitutional, it's un-American. In fact it's none of those those things. But try explaining that to the moronic left. To help educate the mental midgets we present this list of facts about current and recent efforts to put brake on unbridled foreign invasion:
|
|
|
Post by Raymond306 on Mar 25, 2017 15:45:34 GMT -6
I hate the fact...FACT... that so many Democrats, so many Republicans, and so many news organizations have no clue as to what is or is not "constitutional" because they apparently haven't a clue and to what is in the U.S. Constitution. My current rant is caused by the ongoing "Muslim ban" stories and court challenges. I put that in scare quotes because any time you see someone referring to President Trump's "Muslim Ban" that story is already based on a false premise, an outright lie. Here is the latest Constitutional outrage: This paragraph is followed by... One would think this would indicate that how many or how few people are allowed into the country is none of U.S. District Judge Theodore D. Chuang's damned business. But let's take it one step further. The U.S. Constitution, in Article 1 says that Congress is in charge of deciding who does and who does not get into this country and what such entrance into the country may entail. And Congress, by law, specifically designated the president with the authority to make unilateral decisions on allowing or not allowing aliens into this country for whatever reason he/she may have or no reason at all. Now those two facts lead to one conclusion: The recent presidential temporary immigration bans were both Constitutional and legal. Period! And any local, state, or federal judge ruling to the contrary or blocking the president from enforcing a Constitutionally legal action is, in effect, acting unconstitutionally. Or to put it simply, Judge Chuang in Maryland and US District Court Judge Derrick Watson (who presides in Hawaii) don't have any legal authority to make any rulings on the president's executive actions. Since the creation of "lesser" courts (below the level of the Supreme Court) is an enumerated responsibility of the U.S. Congress, it it perhaps time for Republicans in Congress to begin talking about impeachment of judges who act in direct violation of the U.S. Constitution.
|
|