|
Post by Raymond306 on Jul 5, 2016 10:28:44 GMT -6
It looks like, once again, a Clinton is going skate on serious legal charges. We had the Molester/Rapist-in-Chief getting off the hook with the voters and now I'm guessing the presumptive Traitor-in-Chief is going to get off, too. At a brief press conference this morning FBI Director James Comey laid out the case against Hillary Clinton but then concluded by announcing the FBI's recommendation to the Justice Department NOT to pursue charges against the former Sec. of State. What is so fascinating (in a macabre ISIS beheading video sort of way) is how Comey carefully, and precisely laid out the case for criminality for serious violations of the Espionage Act, and then at the end, he demonstrated how the fix was in.
So what I want to know is, where does Gen. David Petraeus go to get his reputation back? Hell! Where to WE go to get our country back?
|
|
|
Post by jab1362 on Jul 5, 2016 17:44:05 GMT -6
Well I've said for a long time this was the test, do we live in a country with the rule of law or the rule of man. We now have our answer. Yesterday the USA was 240 years old, it died today. Voting no longer matters.
|
|
|
Post by Raymond306 on Jul 5, 2016 21:39:12 GMT -6
Well I've said for a long time this was the test, do we live in a country with the rule of law or the rule of man. We now have our answer. I cannot tell you how sad I am to agree with you. There have always been those in public office who were quite capable of ignoring "the law" and getting away with it for the most part. "Boss" Tweed and the Sons of St. Tamany in old New York, the Richard Daley "machine" in Chicago, just name a couple of the more famous political machines, which were capable of the most egregious political corruption. But they were always localized, regional and, in most cases, eventually came to ruin. But the Clintonistas and the Obama Regime seem to have been made for one another turning political corruption into a national pastime. The degree to which the public "Civil Service" has become so blatantly politicized is mind-numbing. I fear those of us striving to return to a constitutional republic are, in the words of former Defense Sec. Don Rumsfeld. "...in for a long, hard slog." Yesterday the USA was 240 years old, it died today. Voting no longer matters. If you read my stuff you know I can be very critical of political evil-doers, yet maintain a positive outlook for the future. But there is something terribly demoralizing in discovering how the head of the FBI (those impartial, incorruptible paragons of law and order) can so vilely abandon his agency honor and ethics.
|
|
|
Post by chrunch on Jul 5, 2016 23:32:33 GMT -6
I am working on this fight over at another website's political thread. At least more than a few people will see my posts.
This is a pretty lively thread.
|
|
|
Post by Raymond306 on Jul 6, 2016 0:35:59 GMT -6
I am working on this fight over at another website's political thread. At least more than a few people will see my posts. This is a pretty lively thread. I'm sure it is, but I'd prefer to have you posting your content here, or at least copies of it, rather than simply spam this site on behalf of GTplanet. I'm sure you understand.
|
|
|
Post by chrunch on Jul 6, 2016 0:52:44 GMT -6
Really ray?
|
|
|
Post by Raymond306 on Jul 6, 2016 7:11:48 GMT -6
Voting no longer matters. And yet, perhaps, voting may be the only thing left that matters. Do some browsing around the Internet and the World Wide Web is on fire with stories, commentary, and predictions surrounding yesterday's announcement by FBI Director James Comey. Just viewing the related political cartoons could keep you busy for hours. My predictions? James Comey is going to take a lot of heat over his press event yesterday including calls for answering tough questions before Congress. And Republicans will spends millions of dollars producing and placing advertising built upon Comey's detailed explanation of how Hillary Clinton is guilty of seriously violating the Espionage Act and several other federal laws.
|
|
|
Post by jab1362 on Jul 6, 2016 18:00:54 GMT -6
Unless comey is playing rope a dope with us and the real prize in his eyes is the Clinton Foundation.. Rico may come into play in an investigation into the foundation, then he could round them all up in indictments. So it's the only thing I can hope for going forward.
If not, it will not be long before we sharpen our knifes and check our weapons because that will be the only option to restore the republic.
|
|
|
Post by Raymond306 on Jul 6, 2016 18:42:23 GMT -6
Unless comey is playing rope a dope with us and the real prize in his eyes is the Clinton Foundation. Rico may come into play in an investigation into the foundation, then he could round them all up in indictments. I have some real problems with that if, in fact, that is the case. Maybe you can straighten me out, Jab. But I don't want the FBI playing "rope a dope" with criminal behavior. Right now the only impression I'm getting from James Comey is that The Law is something only Joe Sixpack has to obey. The ruling elite are immune from criminal consequences no matter how serious, how criminal their behavior is. I agree the Clinton Money Laundering and Bribe Solicitation Foundation has served as Bill and Hillary's personal slush fund for many years. But that shouldn't mean the FBI (or any other criminal investigators) must trade out one important investigation in favor of getting another. Hell, go after both blatant examples of criminal exhibition.
|
|
|
Post by jab1362 on Jul 7, 2016 16:28:02 GMT -6
Ray I agree the law is the law and the FBI should prosecute both cases to the max. I wonder if he is more focused on the foundation as he could get a lot more convictions than just her. It does seem we the people have to obey the law and the elites get a pass.
|
|
|
Post by Raymond306 on Jul 7, 2016 16:51:31 GMT -6
I wonder if he is more focused on the foundation as he could get a lot more convictions than just her. I believe James Comey was focused on his own future and his role in history. You think he wanted to be known for the next two hundred years as the man who derailed the nomination of the first woman to be nominated for president by a manor party and endorsed by the first African-American President who made it clear SHE was his choice to succeed him and ensure the continuation of the legacy of the first African-American President? You think James Comey was going to be the guy to stand up to Barack Obama? Nobody else in Washington D.C. (with the exception of a very small number of patriots) has the balls to defy the first African American President. Why should Comey be any better endowed?
|
|
|
Post by jab1362 on Jul 8, 2016 18:15:06 GMT -6
Because for the next two hundred years his name would be used like one of the founders. He becomes the pivot point for the next conservative wave to turn back progressivism for the next hundred years.
|
|
|
Post by Raymond306 on Jul 8, 2016 21:05:35 GMT -6
He becomes the pivot point for the next conservative wave to turn back progressivism for the next hundred years. First let me say that part about "turning back progressivism for the next hundred years" might be a bit of over reach. However, I'll point your statement is excellent in its viewpoint, it speaks of determination of will, and I'll sure as hell steal that line to use for myself at some point in the future.
|
|
|
Post by jab1362 on Jul 9, 2016 13:05:09 GMT -6
Feel free to use that line anytime. I think you're right about the overreach but there comes a time when that you can no longer rationalize being a person willing to compromise with insanity. Then and there you dig in and fight back at the progressive movement and you don't stop until your side wins.
|
|
|
Post by Raymond306 on Jul 9, 2016 13:34:43 GMT -6
Awwwww MAN! You have hit the nail well and truly on the head with this observation: ...there comes a time when that you can no longer rationalize being a person willing to compromise with insanity. Then and there you dig in and fight back at the progressive movement and you don't stop until your side wins. I've used a similar phrasing, "One cannot compromise with evil and remain true to oneself." And then I've use this example: "OK, let's see if we have this straight, Mr. Hitler. You want to send 6,000,000 Jews to the gas chambers along with millions of other (cough) undesirables. I'm afraid we can't go along with that. How about we cut it to 3,000,000 Jews and half as many undesirables? If think we could show "we know how to govern" with this compromise. What do you say, Dolf?" Flash forward to 2016 and we have the Wussie from Wisconsin agreeing to hold a vote on the 2nd Amendment to placate, to compromise with the insanity of the Democrats. NEWS FLASH! The Bill of Rights is not up for debate. This is a core issue. You don't compromise on core issues. It is well past time somebody with integrity stood up to the Democrats in Congress and announced, "We aren't going to do that, and if you don't like it you can kiss my ass!" Same way somebody should have said, "Mr. President, you are tasked with enforcing our laws, including immigration law, whether you like it or not. So therefore, since you seem determined to violate the law we (as the House of Reps and holders of the purse strings) are going to defund your illegal alien invasion of the U.S." "Then I'll just veto your budget" "Go ahead an veto it" "But that means a government shut down." "Then shut the damned thing down because we are NOT going to compromise with insanity."
|
|
|
Post by jab1362 on Jul 9, 2016 15:27:13 GMT -6
Yup I completely agree. Time for someone down there to grow a set and do just what you've said. Unfortunately the guys I see doing that are all Brits, Nigal Farage and Daniel Hanigan come to mind. We need a couple of guys like that in the house. I think we have a few in the senate,Cruz,Lee,and Paul, who can carry the torch.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2016 18:19:17 GMT -6
Raymond are you really taking Trump seriously? 😑
|
|
|
Post by Raymond306 on Aug 2, 2016 18:30:24 GMT -6
Raymond are you really taking Trump seriously? Hey hey, Mikey! Damned good to see you. Do I take Trump seriously? I'm not sure, but I DO take Hillary seriously which is why she has to be defeated.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2016 10:57:34 GMT -6
None of my image links work anymore. Nice Russian website. Did Trump sell it to you 😝
|
|
|
Post by Raymond306 on Aug 3, 2016 13:18:06 GMT -6
Git away from that wheelbarra Lee Roy! You KNOW you don't know nuthin' about no masheenry! . o O (I wonder what "image links" he's talking about?)
|
|